Updated  05/07/08

MINUTES OF THE
FLORIDA INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT

Board of Commissioners Board Meeting

9:00 a.m., Friday, March 21, 2008

Indian River Plantation Marriott Hotel
555 N.E. Ocean Boulevard
Stuart, Martin County, Florida


ITEM 1.          Call to Order.

Chair Padera called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m.

ITEM 2.          Pledge of Allegiance.

Commissioner Byrd led the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.

ITEM 3.          Roll Call.

Assistant Executive Director Crosley called the roll and Chair Padera, Vice-Chair Mesiano, Treasurer Bray, Commissioner Barck, Commissioner Crowley, Commissioner Engle, Commissioner Kavanagh, Commissioner Netts, and Commissioner Sansom were present stated that a quorum was present.  Commissioner Byrd arrived to the meeting at 9:02 a.m. and Secretary Barkett arrived to the meeting at 9:05 a.m.

ITEM 4.          Consent Agenda.

Commissioner Sansom stated that he would like to add to the Consent Agenda; Item 17A, Additional Waterway Cleanup Project in Martin County with the Marine Industries Association of the Treasure Coast.

Commissioner Barck made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended.  The motion was seconded by Vice-Chair Mesiano.  Chair Padera asked for any further discussion, hearing none, a vote was taken and the motion passed.

ITEM 5.          Additions or Deletions.

Mr. Roach stated that he would like to add to the agenda; Item 17B, Publication of Color Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Zone Brochures for Miami-Dade and Broward Counties.  He also distributed some additional information for Item 13.

Vice-Chair Mesiano made a motion to approve the final agenda as amended. The motion was seconded by Treasurer Bray.  Chair Padera asked for any further discussion, hearing none, a vote was taken and the motion passed.

ITEM 6.          Board Meeting Minutes.

Chair Padera presented the Board meeting minutes and asked if there were any questions or discussion.  There were none.

Commissioner Netts made a motion to approve the minutes as presented.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sansom.  Chair Padera asked for any further discussion, hearing none, a vote was taken and the motion passed.

ITEM 7.          Public Comments.

Chair Padera asked if there were any public comments on issues that are not on today’s agenda. 

Mr. Gerald Ward, for the Marine Industries Association of the Treasure Coast (MIATC), stated that he would like to thank the District for helping to fund the waterway cleanup projects in St. Lucie and Indian River Counties.

Mr. Ward stated that yesterday there was a meeting coordinated by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) about maintenance dredging and navigation through the Okeechobee Waterway (OWW).  He stated that the MIATC feels that the meeting was productive and will help get this information to the public.

ITEM 9.          Comments from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Mr. Rick McMillen, Project Manager for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, stated that the plans and specifications for the Palm Valley North Reach project have been finalized and a contract should be awarded this fall.  He stated that the dredged material will be placed into the DMMA DU-9 site.

Mr. McMillen stated that the IWW Volusia Middle and North Reach maintenance dredging project ground breaking ceremony was held March 19, 2008.  He stated that this project was originally estimated to cost $10 million.  He stated that the base bid plus three bid options came in at $7.7 million.  He stated that Southwind Construction was awarded the Notice to Proceed on February 22nd and that construction is scheduled to begin next week. 

Mr. McMillen stated that the plans and specifications are almost complete for the DMMA IR-2 construction project.  He stated that we are still working with Taylor Engineering to obtain the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP).  He stated that this is a critical site and that this project is scheduled to go to contract by September.

Mr. McMillen stated that the Corps held a bid opening for the IWW Jupiter dredging project on February 5th and there were no bids.  He stated that the District staff has moved forward with contracting for this dredging operation.

Mr. Roach stated that the District placed this project out for bid and we received two bids and the low qualified bidder was in the amount of $2.2 million.  He stated that this contractor and his equipment have completed similar jobs in the past.  He stated that the only difference in the two bids was the mobilization costs.  He stated that the dredge will be set up by Monday and dredging is expected to begin by next Friday.  He stated that if this project is started before April 1st, 150,000 cubic yards of material can be moved by April 30th.  He stated that the District will work under the Corps’ permit for this project. 

Chair Padera asked about the project hitting unsuitable material.  Mr. Roach stated that this project is being completed by a contractor with the right equipment and project knowledge.  He stated that the contractor is not worried about hitting unsuitable material and the permit has guidelines on how to handle any unsuitable material. 

Mr. Roach stated that the only challenge to this project is a dredging area north of the bridge that is completely surrounded by seagrass.  He stated that there are permit criteria about avoiding any impact to seagrass. 

Chair Padera stated that there is a lot of community interest in this project and he asked if the District has spoken to the press about the Jupiter project.  Mr. Roach stated yes.

Mr. McMillen stated that the clearing and grubbing of DMMA’s SJ-29, BV-4B, IR-7A, IR-14, and MSA 524-B contract will be sent out today to the selected contractor.  

Mr. McMillen stated that the Waterway Inspection Trip is scheduled for April 9th through 11th and will start in Stuart and travel north.  He asked for questions and there were none. 

ITEM 8.          Miami River Dredging Project Status Report.

Mr. Evan Skornik, Acting Miami-Dade County Service Center Director for the South Florida Water Management District, and Mr. Brett Bibeau, Managing Director for the Miami River Commission, stated that they will be providing a status report on the Miami River Dredging Project and their request to complete the project through the District’s Cooperative Assistance Program. 

Mr. Skornik stated that the Miami River is home to the fourth largest port in the State of Florida.  He stated that the dredging of the river will improve navigation, the natural environment, and the local economy.  He stated that a total of 751,000 cubic yards of sediment will be removed from the Miami River with a total project cost of $88 million.

Mr. Skornik stated that the Miami River maintenance dredging project commenced in September 2004 and by December 2005, six sections were completed.  He stated that as of March 2007, the project was 40% complete, removing 240,000 tons of sediments from the Miami River.

Mr. Skornik stated that dredging of section seven has just been completed, section eight is currently being dredged, and yesterday the Corps awarded dredging contracts for sections nine through twelve.  He stated that dredging for these sections should be completed by the end of 2008. 

Mr. Skornik stated that Miami-Dade County is the local sponsor for this project and has provided $4 million in funding for this project.  He stated that additional funding has been provided from the Federal Government $44 million, the South Florida Water Management District $3 million, the State of Florida $18 million, the City of Miami $3 million, and $6 million from FIND.

Mr. Skornik stated that the project contract agreement with the Corps expires in January 2009 and there is a contractual funding deadline of September 30, 2008.  He stated that at this time there is a $10 million funding shortage.  He stated that if the remaining funding for this project cannot be obtained, the project will not be completed.  He stated that, if this project is not completed under this contract, a new contract, will have to be negotiated and the project cost will go up significantly. 

Mr. Skornik stated that he has permission to request a $3 million bridge loan from the SFWMD governing Board.  He stated that this is in the hopes that the District will approve a grant to fund $3 million towards this project. 

Secretary Barkett asked when the last time the Miami River was dredged.  Mr. Skornik stated that the river was originally dredged in the 1930s and there has never been any maintenance dredging.  Secretary Barkett asked about the dredging depth.  Mr. Skornik stated fifteen feet. 

Commissioner Engle asked about other agencies that are committed to provide funding for this final project phase.  Mr. Skornik stated that Miami-Dade County, the City of Miami, the SFWMD, and FIND have all been approached about providing additional project funding.  He stated that this is an $80 million partnership effort that is down to the final $10 million in funding requests.

Mr. Bibeau stated that the original funding shortfall was $18 million. He stated that they have received an additional $5 million from the State of Florida and $3 million from the SFWMD which brought the funding shortfall down to $10 million.  He stated that the Corps has two funding cycles left before the contract deadline, but that the Corps must receive the funding commitments by July 31st.

Vice-Chair Mesiano asked about private contributions towards this project.  Mr. Skornik stated that the Miami River Commission is a local advocate of this project and they meet on a regular basis with the private project partners.  He stated that the Miami River’s shipping terminals are currently experiencing huge out of pocket expenses because of the new Maritime Security regulations.  He stated that it is their tax dollars that are helping to fund the Federal share of this project.

Commissioner Crowley stated that this District has been and is a significant funding partner with Miami-Dade County on this project.  He stated that Federal funding has fallen short and it is hopeful that the District can help along with the local partners.  He stated that this is the last piece to the puzzle.

Chair Padera asked about the local contributions to this project.  Mr. Skornik stated that the budget does not reflect land purchase, material storage, management, and in-kind costs.  He stated that additionally, this sedimentation was caused by improper stormwater run off and those issues were addressed before this project was started.  He stated that this project has been designed to last for fifty years without additional maintenance.

Secretary Barkett stated that, according to the project budget, the District has contributed more funding towards this project than the City of Miami.  He asked for a statement showing the local contribution for items not addressed in the project budget.  Mr. Bibeau stated that he will obtain that information from the County and City.

Mr. Bibeau stated that the Miami River Commission took the necessary steps to create a Special Taxing District and adopt Strategic Plan with Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to help pay for this project.  He stated that the elected officials for the City and County did not adopt that TIF.  

Commissioner Sansom stated that he feels that the City of Miami should do no less than match all funds provided by FIND for this project.  Mr. Bibeau stated that the local sponsor for this project is Miami-Dade County and they have a cooperative project agreement with the City of Miami.  Commissioner Sansom stated that Miami-Dade County should also provide additional funding.

Vice-Chair Mesiano asked about the primary beneficiaries from the sales tax revenue that is generated by the businesses along the Miami River.  Commissioner Sansom stated that all sale tax revenue goes to the State of Florida.

Commissioner Byrd stated that the Miami River is important to the City and County.  She stated that the local authority needs to prioritize their grant requests and she suggested that any other grant project should be delayed and all available grant funding should be put towards this project.

Commissioner Engle stated that four years ago there was discussion about construction of a public a boardwalk for waterfront viewing along the river.  She asked if that project has moved forward.  Mr. Bibeau stated that the Miami River Greenway project is underway and will provide a ten mile connecting pedestrian path along this waterway.

Chair Padera asked that the Board’s comments be considered as a constructive message to the City of Miami and Miami-Dade County regarding the District’s provision of additional funding for this project. 

ITEM 10.        Martin County Status Report.

Mr. Roach stated that Phase I of the Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) for the 21 miles of Intracoastal Waterway (IWW) in Martin County was completed in 1993.  He stated that Phase II of the DMMP was also completed in 1993 and all major land acquisition was completed in 2001.

Mr. Roach stated that the 50 year dredging projection for the IWW is 1.4 million cubic yards and the storage projection is 2.7 million cubic yards.  He stated that Maintenance Dredging in Reach II in the Crossroads area is 85% of the dredging volume and occurs every 3 years.  

Mr. Roach stated that the District is also the local sponsor for navigation of 97 miles of Okeechobee Waterway in Martin County.  He stated that Phase I of the Dredged Material Management Plan for the Okeechobee Waterway from the Crossroads to the St. Lucie Lock was completed in 1998 and the section from the St. Lucie Lock to the western Martin County line was completed in 2007.  He stated that Phase II of the DMMP from the Crossroads to the St. Lucie Lock was completed in 2001 and the Phase II Plan from the Lock to the Western County Line is underway. 

Mr. Roach stated that the 50 year dredging projection is 1.5 million cubic yards and the storage projection is 3 million cubic yards.

Mr. Roach stated that acquisition of four Dredged Material Management Areas to serve the section of the OWW from the Crossroads to the St. Lucie Lock was completed in 2006.  He stated that acquisition of two sites to serve the section of the OWW from the St. Lucie Lock to the western Martin County line is just initiating. 

Mr. Roach stated that, to date only, one of the seven upland Dredged Material Management Areas the in county has been fully constructed.  He stated that Site MSA 524B is scheduled for Phase I construction by the Corps of Engineers in the fall of 2008.  He stated that the other sites are in various phases of environmental permitting, engineering, or design.

Mr. Roach stated that in 2009, the Crossroads Area of the ICW and OWW will be dredged with the material being placed in DMMA M-5.  He stated that funding for dredging of the OWW has been requested from Congress and dredging has been tentatively set for the fall of 2010.

Mr. Roach stated that the Martin County Waterways Economic Study was completed in 2000 and it found that there were 349 waterway related businesses in the County employing 4,237 people, with salaries of $123 million and a direct economic output of $326 million. He stated that property values were determined to be increased by $588 million by the presence of the ICW channel.  He stated that the study shows that these economic benefits would be cut in half if maintenance dredging of the waterways in the County ceased.

Mr. Roach stated that since 1986, the District has provided $5.5 million in Waterways Assistance Program funding to 56 projects in the County having a total constructed value of $27 million.  He stated that the County, the City of Stuart, and the Town of Jupiter Island have participated in the program. 

Mr. Roach stated that the District's Cooperative Assistance Program has provided funding assistance for 25 state and regional agency projects with elements in Martin County.

ITEM 11.        District Project Report.

            Mr. Roach stated that the District is actively working on fourteen land management projects.  He stated that final design and permitting of DMMA NA-1 is moving forward.  He stated that staff is working with our partners on the island concerning the development of the roadway.  He stated that roadway is a critical path item. 

            Mr. Roach stated that DMMA DU-2 has been completely filled and the material needs to be offloaded to regain capacity for an upcoming 2010 dredging event.  He stated that the material on DMMA DU-3 should be offloaded before the site is reconstructed in 2009.  He stated that the material from these sites will be tested and then offered to local government.  He stated that if the locals do not want the material, then it will be advertised for bid. 

            Mr. Roach stated that security fencing has just been installed around the newly acquired DMMA DU-6B.

            Mr. Roach stated that DMMA DU-9 will be utilized to manage dredged materials from the 2009 Palm Valley Dredging Project.  He stated that the permit provided by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) to build the site will need to be converted to an Operation Permit. 

            Mr. Roach stated that cleanup work continues on DMMA SJ-14.  He stated that the contractor is ready to re-vegetate the impacted area.

            Mr. Roach stated that the District has just completed a public pathway and shoreline stabilization project with the City of Palm Coast at DMMA FL-8. 

            Mr. Roach stated that the shoreline of MSA 434C has experienced severe erosion exposing the discharge pipe and removing a restored wetland.  He stated that the District will install a rock splash pad to protect the pipe.  He stated that the wetland will be mitigated elsewhere on the property.

Mr. Roach stated that construction of the DMMA BV-NASA project began in January 2008.  He stated that there has been a problem finding suitable material for dike construction and we are watching that situation closely. 

Mr. Roach stated that DMMA BV-4B is scheduled for clearing and grubbing in the near future.  He stated that 24 Gopher Tortoise burrows and more than five Gopher Tortoises were located on the site.  He stated that any Gopher Tortoises in the project area will need to be relocated to an offsite property. 

Mr. Roach stated that the Brazilian Peppers along the shoreline of the pipeline easement are being removed from DMMA BV-40.  He stated that the District is working with the adjacent developer to bury pipeline casing underground.

Mr. Roach noted that the fence installation at DMMA IR-14B has been completed.

Mr. Roach stated that permitting and design have been completed for DMMA SL-2.  He stated that the final construction plans and specifications are in preparation and that this project will be going out to bid soon.  He stated that we will be using this site in 2009.

Mr. Roach stated that we have finalized the plans and specifications for the hurricane repairs to our gabion mat at MSA M-5.  He stated that the project permits are about to be issued and construction is scheduled for May 2008.  He stated that the re-vegetation plans have been received for review.

Mr. Roach stated that the ICW Matanzas Inlet Sedimentation Study is moving forward and should be completed by June 2008.  He stated that the hydrodynamic model is near completion.

Mr. Roach stated that the ICW Jupiter maintenance dredging project should begin next week.  He stated that the project cost is $2.2 million and that 130,000 cubic yards of material will be dredged and placed on the beach south of the Jupiter Inlet.

Mr. Roach stated that the ICW Cut P-50 maintenance dredging project was completed yesterday.  He stated that Palm Beach County’s project to dredge the inlet sand trap and the access channel to the Boynton Boat Club Park has also been completed.

Mr. Roach stated that the District has requested a scope of service and fee quote from the District Engineer for a feasibility study for the design, permitting, and construction of the New River Deepening project in Broward County.  He stated that the study will determine the existing channel depths and what type of improvements can be made.  He stated that an Interlocal Agreement has been entered into with the City of Fort Lauderdale for this project.

Mr. Roach stated that Hurricane Wilma delayed the resource survey for the ICW/Dania Cut-Off Canal deepening.  He stated that survey was completed in November, shortly after the hurricane, and now the National Marine Fisheries Service is questioning the validity of that survey.  He stated that they may require that a new survey be completed.  He stated that project permitting and design are underway.  He stated that this deepening project will support commercial and mega yacht use of the Broward County waterways. 

Commissioner Byrd asked about the information that the resource survey provides.  Mr. Roach stated that the survey provides information regarding environmental resources, particularly seagrasses. 

Mr. Roach stated that the District is currently working on four Land Acquisition projects.  He stated that staff has a meeting coming up with the City regarding the Port of Miami site request.  He stated that staff is continuing discussions with Broward County regarding the Western storage site and the Port Everglades site.  He stated that staff is working with the property owner to obtain the V-6 access easement.

Mr. Roach quickly highlighted two Waterways Assistance Projects, the Eau Gallie  Pier Reconstruction in Melbourne Beach, and the Dinner Key Spoil Island Enhancement project. 

Commissioner Sansom stated that Brevard County is very grateful for the District’s help with funding for the reconstruction of their historic Eau Gallie Pier.

Mr. Roach stated that the District currently has three economic studies underway; Nassau and Broward Counties, and the Mega Yacht Study.

Mr. Roach stated that, this year, three Counties that have not previously participated in the District’s Waterway Clean up Program have been added to the program.  He stated that they are Flagler, St. Lucie, and Indian River Counties.

ITEM 12.        Washington D. C. Status Report.

Mr. Roach stated that he, Chair Padera, Secretary Barkett, Commissioner Crowley, and Commissioner Engle went to Washington on February 26th and 27th to meet with the District’s Congressional Delegation and other key members and staff to discuss the maintenance dredging of the Intracoastal Waterway (IWW) and the Okeechobee Waterway (OWW).  He stated that the need for a dedicated funding source for the IWW was also discussed. 

Mr. Roach stated that the most important meetings were with the staff for: Congressmen Ander Crenshaw, Dave Weldon, John Mica, Tim Mahoney, and Alcee Hastings; and Senators Nelson and Martinez.  He stated that these are the members that we would like to take the lead on our funding requests.  He stated that other important meetings were with the House and Senate Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittees and Congressman Dave Hobson who is the Ranking Member of the Energy and Water Appropriations subcommittee.  He stated that staff and our counsel feel that these meetings were productive.

Commissioner Byrd asked about discussing Congressman Mahoney’s Indian River Lagoon (IRL) proposal.  Mr. Roach stated that Congressman Mahoney is proposing to designate the IRL as a  National Marine Sanctuary.  He stated that the IRL is currently designated as an Aquatic Preserve and an estuary of national importance.  He stated that the District’s Dredged Material Management effort has been crafted to meet those environmental designations.  He stated that the District has committed $30 million towards this effort just for the IRL section of the waterway.  He stated that the District has been successful in jumping these types of hurdles but the hurdles just kept getting higher.  He stated that to designate the IRL as a National Marine Sanctuary would create another challenge.  He stated that the District should be very concerned and cautious about this proposal. 

Commissioner Byrd stated that Congressman Mahoney’s Martin County staff has advised her that Congressman Mahoney is planning a charette next week to discuss the IRL designation and the Indian Street Bridge.  She stated that the District may be able to become involved in this charette. 

Commissioner Sansom stated that, if the IRL were to be designated as a National Marine Sanctuary, this District would be the entity with the most to lose.  He stated that we must ask ourselves how the District’s operations would be affected by this designation and what it would add to our ability to perform our mission. 

Secretary Barkett stated that the District must detail how these proposed changes would impact the District’s ability to provide waterway maintenance.  He stated that we also must show how the cost of the changes would far exceed any benefits.  He noted that this waterway is already protected.

Secretary Barkett stated that he was very impressed by the District’s Washington legal counsel and the way they work on our behalf.  He stated that because of our legal counsel’s introduction, we were very well received at every official office we visited. 

Commissioner Sansom stated that if this designation were to happen the IRL would be provided an additional layer of protection.  He stated that the designation would provide a higher significance for seagrass impacts with an increased fine structure.  He stated that there is the promise of additional Federal funds, but those are environmental funds not funds for dredging and waterway maintenance.  He stated that we should not be against this proposal, but we must remain concerned about how it would impact our ability to perform our job and ask those types of questions.

Chair Padera stated that the District should stay on top of this proposal, ask questions in the correct arena and demand answers. 

Secretary Barkett stated that the District should gather the facts about user and economic costs related to this proposal and present them to Congressman Mahoney. 

Commissioner Byrd stated that Congressman Mahoney is not familiar with the impact of the marine industries.  She stated that he needs to be educated on this issue.

Chair Padera stated that good intentions are behind this proposal without knowledge of its ramifications.

Commissioner Sansom stated that there is an extremely large marine interest in Congressman Mahoney’s District.  He stated that the Congressman will soon learn from the people involved with recreational fishing and marine boating that this proposal will work against them and limit their activities and that they will work to prevent it from moving forward.

Commissioner Sansom stated that the entire Florida Keys have been designated as a National Marine Sanctuary and it has limited the local’s ability to manage their waterways.  He stated that this is a designation that is made by the President and that this President has a habit of making quick environmental decisions and therefore, we must move quickly on this.

Mr. Roach stated that while in Washington, they were able to meet with Congressman Dave Hobson.  He stated that Congressman Hobson is not one of the District’s Florida Congressmen but that he is the head of the Energy and Water Sub-Committee.  He stated that this was an important meeting and was available only through the efforts of the District’s legal counsel.

Mr. Roach stated that he is the Chairman of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Association and was in Washington D. C. from February 27th through February 29th on behalf of that association.  He stated that they visited with the delegations from South Carolina, North Carolina, and Georgia.  He stated that the discussions were centered around the needs of the waterway.  He stated that the delegations from those states do not support requests for increased Federal funding like the Florida delegation does.  He stated that these delegations were not against waterway funding requests, but may not work to support those requests.

ITEM 13.        Tallahassee Report.

Mr. Roach stated that the Navigation District Bill has passed its first two committees.  He stated that the bill has been amended to remove most of the FDEP language and some Seaport language was added.  He stated that the bill has been reduced from 20 pages down to eight pages and it still includes the original sections of the bill proposed by the District.  He stated that our Seaport friends have added some references to themselves to take advantage of some of the improvements that the District is making to the dredging permit process. 

Mr. Roach stated that the bill includes language that non-member counties, which contain any part of the Intracoastal Waterway within their boundaries, can work with the District through Interlocal Agreements.  He stated that these counties would include Hendry and Monroe.

Mr. Roach referred to a section in the bill that fully transfers the manatee protection speed zone regulatory markers to the FWC on July 1, 2008.  He stated that FWC has completed an analysis that shows that it will cost them around $500,000.00 per year to perform this task.  He stated that due to the recent budget shortfall in Tallahassee, the FWC may not have the funds to move forward with this project.  He stated that the District agreed to revise the language in the bill so that the FWC could come back to the District for grants to help fund this responsibility, but that was not entirely acceptable to the FWC.  He stated that the FWC requested that the District extend the current Memorandum of Agreement another three years and continue to help fund the program at $100,000.00 per year.  He stated that the cost for the District to take back this responsibility is approximately $200,000.00 per year, so the option to help the FWC is less expensive for the District.  He stated that the Board must make a firm commitment to extend this agreement before the District’s bill can move forward.

Commissioner Netts made a motion to approve the recommendation to extend the FWC Memorandum of Agreement for another three years.  The motion was seconded by Commissioner Byrd.  Chair Padera asked for any further discussion, hearing none, a vote was taken and the motion passed.

Secretary Barkett questioned the section of the bill addressing mixing zone turbidity and questioned if the wording “is granted” should be replaced with “should be allowed.”  Commissioner Sansom stated that the wording is correct because it is not a permanent condition.

Commissioner Engle stated that she does not want new Interlocal Agreement programs with non-member counties to dilute any of the District’s current programs.  She cautioned that this District should not try to be everything to all.  She stated that she does not favor taking tax money from a paying county to perform a project in a county that is not part of the District and that does not pays taxes to the District.

Commissioner Sansom stated that Senate Bill 1427 is currently going through the House and Senate and will help facilitate inlet management and the dredging and placement of sand on Florida’s beaches.  He stated that this bill directs DEP to fund inlet management projects as part of their beach management program and spend the funds that the Legislature sets aside for this program.  He stated that the District has proposed an amendment to the bill to include language to make it clear that the DEP needs to look near shore as well as in waterway channels for beach sand to place back on the beach. 

ITEM 14.      Review of Assistance Program Rule Language Regarding the Charging of User Fees at District Funded Waterway Facilities. 

Chair Padera stated that because of recent budget changes, he felt the Board should review the District’s Assistance Program rules regarding the charging of user fees and differential user fees at District funded waterway facilities. 

Mr. Roach stated that the District’s Assistance Program rules have three areas that address user fees; Definitions, Policy, and Project Eligibility.  He stated that funded projects must provide services to the general public on a first come basis with no club membership, stock ownership, or differential in price.  He stated that these projects cannot charge a membership fee, but they can charge a user fee.  He stated that these fees must be reasonable and the same for the general public living in all District Counties.  He also noted that the applicant for any facility that will be managed by a third-party operator must oversee their facility operating hours and admission fees.

Commissioner Netts stated that he feels that the amount of time that the District’s guidelines are in place should be adjusted according to the percentage of the project that the District funds, instead of the current 25 year rule.

Commissioner Engle stated that she feels that user fees should be in proportion to the maintenance and restoration of that particular facility and should be used for those purposes.

Vice-Chair Mesiano stated that any public marina that receives funding from the District must return all user fees into the operation and maintenance costs of that facility.  He stated that for example, a facility that returns their user fees to a general fund cannot come to the District for grant funding.

Chair Padera suggested that staff craft some rule language regarding facility revenue in excess of the maintenance costs of the facility.

Commissioner Netts stated that District funded facilities should operate their facility with an enterprise fund or not receive funding.  He stated that the District’s dollars should not be a conduit for general revenue to the City.

ITEM 15.        Draft Report on the Economic Analysis of the District’s Waterways in Nassau County. 

Treasurer Bray referred to the Nassau County Economic Analysis and stated that Nassau County and particularly Fernandina Beach will find this information valuable as they prepare to redevelop their waterway facilities.  He stated that there are several new waterfront development projects underway that will add to these economic figures.  He stated that he is anxious to provide this information to the City, County, and the Economic Development Council. 

Mr. Roach stated that the District’s economic analysis consultant, GEC, has completed the draft report on the Economic Analysis of the District’s Waterways in Nassau County.  He stated that there are currently 76 marine related businesses in Nassau County that generate $55 million in business volume, 515 jobs, and pay $16 million in salaries.  He stated that the waterway increases property taxes from $141 million to $168.5 million.

Mr. Roach stated that if the Nassau County waterways were no longer maintained, we would see a decrease of $12 million in business volume, lose 111 jobs with salaries of $3 million, and property taxes would decrease between $50 million to $110 million.

Mr. Roach stated that if the waterways were dredged more frequently, it would increase business volume by $3 million, add 31 jobs, and $1 million in personal income, and increase property values another $1 million.

Mr. Roach stated that the study includes a mail survey of marine related businesses and that survey indicated that about 58% of these businesses are located on the waterway.  He stated that over half of the firms believe that their revenue would decrease if the waterway was not maintained.

Mr. Roach stated that we also surveyed 305 Nassau County registered boaters and found out that recreational boaters spend approximately $51.00 for gas, food, drinks, and ice at local establishments before they get to the waterway.  He stated that those expenditures are for non-marine items at establishments not located on the waterways and include $2.16 million for gasoline and $1.05 million for food, drinks, and ice. 

Mr. Roach stated that 68% of the Nassau County boaters are small vessel owners that utilize the Intracoastal Waterway.  He stated that 67% of those boats are tailored and stored at home.

Mr. Roach stated that boat owners commented that the condition of the public facilities on the waterway in Nassau County is poor and they are in need of upgrading and repair. 

ITEM 16.        Finance and Budget Committee Report.

Chair Bray stated that the District’s Finance and Budget Committee met before today’s Board meeting and the Committee reviewed and recommends approval of the January 2008 financial information. 

Treasurer Bray made a motion to approve the recommendations from the Finance and Budget Committee. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Barck.  Chair Padera asked for any further discussion, hearing none, a vote was taken and the motion passed.

ITEM 17B.     Publication of Color Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Zone Brochures for Miami-Dade and Broward Counties. 

Mr. Roach stated that staff has received three quotes for the publication of color Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Zone Brochures for Miami-Dade and Broward Counties and he recommends the low qualified bidder, JKG Group in the amount of $6,600.00.

Vice-Chair Mesiano made a motion to approve the low quote for the publication of color Manatee Protection and Boating Safety Zone brochures for Miami-Dade and Broward Counties.  The motion was seconded by Treasurer Bray.  Chair Padera asked for any further discussion, hearing none, a vote was taken and the motion passed. 

ITEM 17.        Additional Staff Comments and Additional Agenda Items.

Mr. Crosley stated that the Waterway Inspection Trip is scheduled for April 9th through 11th and will start in Stuart and travel north.  He asked that any Commissioner interested in this trip to contact him right away.

ITEM 18.        Additional Commissioners Comments.

            Vice-Chair Mesiano stated that he would like more information on the Indian River Lagoon initiative that Congressman Mahoney is proposing.

            Chair Padera stated that the Indian River Lagoon South Program did not get funded in the President’s budget.  He stated that there is a lot of interest in trying to motivate Congress to fund that program.  He stated that may or may not be connected to Congressman Mahoney’s initiative.

            Commissioner Engle asked that information be provided to Commissioners before Congressman Mahoney’s charette, so that interested parties can make their plans.

ITEM 19.        Adjournment.

Chair Padera stated that hearing no further business the meeting was adjourned at 11:40 a.m.

==============================================================================================================
Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records.  If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records
request, do not send
electronic mail to this entity.  Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.  This notice is required by Sec.
668.6076, F.S., which is effective July 1, 2006.